information
our opinion
Site appraisal | Site appraisal |
|
A overview to explore all the options and a planning submission. Bespoke kitchen, rear extension, attic conversion. Friday, 25th May 25, 2007 Re; Hansford Square
Following a full investigation of your home on 3rd May 2007, we are pleased to describe our findings and main recommendations. Summary
This report describes the findings of the full site investigation on a
room by room basis, although there are key issues which re-occurred
throughout your home. Location constraints and opportunities
In general the original house is a good example of post-war housing
stock, well designed and sturdily built. It is also well sited to take
advantage of renewable energy sources, with solar potential excellent
in regard to both planning concerns and practical details.
For example, the rear of the house has very good solar orientation, and
is not over-shaded. Roof and attic
The general impression within the attic room and associated storage
areas in the eaves is of poor quality construction and a lack of attention to
detail. Investigation in the eaves has shown that insulation levels are
minimal at about 3 to 4 inches between the ceiling joists and similar
between the roof rafters, which are boarded with plasterboard. The
installation of the mineral wool insulation between the rafters has
been done in such a way as to prevent ventilation around the timbers.
When moisture from the floors below condenses on the cold surface of
the roofing felt, the lack of a ventilation gap will allow the moisture
to remain in the area, and means that the performance of the insulation
will be reduced and there will be a risk of long term damage to the
roof structure. Heating and hot water
The house is heated by a Worcester Bosch ‘Highflow 400’ combination
boiler, with heatstore. This is a good modern boiler and it seems to be
working well, although it appears to be over-sized for the house. If
solar hot water replaces some of its function, it may be that a smaller
boiler would be more efficient, although further investigation would be
needed to assess this. Bedroom One
This room is on the north side of the house and has a
large glazed area above a single skin (uninsulated) bay. There is also
a low level of insulation in the loft above, so the thermal performance
of this room could be improved by adding insulation to the bay wall and
by upgrading the loft insulation. Bedroom Two
Large amounts of heat are lost from the over-large glazed area of the
bay window. Equally, as the elevation is southwest facing, there will
be excessive solar gain on sunny days. The glazing units fitted to the
uPVC structure are built with a spacer of 12mm thickness, and so are
less efficient than windows with the recommended 16mm spacer. Evidence
of structural movement is visible in cracking to the right of the bay. Bedroom Three
This room is warm from solar gain due to the southwesterly elevation
and the presence of the hot water pipes from the boiler above, which
run within a box on the wall. Here the window units are built with a
20mm spacer, which is also less efficient than the 16mm standard. The
window does not seal completely since the catches need maintenance. Bedroom Four
This room is cold and a combination of factors is likely to be
responsible. The front elevation is northeast facing, therefore the
oriel window fitted is totally inappropriate for its location: it
presents an area of over 2.5 times the area of the original window
aperture (which is already large for the northerly elevation of a small
room) and the insulation installed in the structure is almost certainly
minimal by any standards. Study/Bedroom
The outward opening door is believed to be a hazard which should be
attended to in the course of future works. This room could be
redeveloped in the future, as en-suite facilities for the two adjoining
bedrooms, for example. Bathroom
In this room there is another non-closing window, also fitted with 20mm
glazing units (see Bedroom Three, above). There is no extractor fan,
air brick, or form of venting other than the window. Venting is a
Building Regulations requirement in a shower room. The lighting
(halogen down-lighters) has been installed without the required fire
prevention measures. Conservatory
Two small excavations were made in order to examine the wall structure
and footings, which revealed a course of concrete block on the outside
and three courses of soft bricks on the inner face, laid on a
foundation of concrete (500mm wide by 180mm deep). Subject to
confirmation from a structural engineer, it is considered that this an
inadequate foundation for any extension which might be planned. It was
noted that although a membrane has been installed under the floor, it
is below ground level, and there is no 'french drain' around the base of
the low wall. It is also noted that the downpipe for the main roof is
routed into the corner formed by the conservatory and the rear wall of
the kitchen extension, where the water butt is situated. The downpipe
may be inadequate for the now-enlarged roofing area and may be backing
up and soaking the ground near the water butt. This could be the cause
of the low-level ingress of moisture noted by the clients, but further
investigation is needed on a wetter day. Dining Area
This area will be hard to keep warm in cold weather due to the
thermally inefficient french doors, which open directly into the
conservatory. In the current arrangement, these doors should be
upgraded to external-type doors for extra security and better thermal
performance. At the least, they should be draught-proofed all around.
Once again, the halogen down-lighters need to made compliant with fire
regulations. Kitchen
As before, the down-lighters are non-compliant, but this did make it
easy to see that there appears to be no insulation installed in the
recently built kitchen extension roof. This is a major flaw in the
building, in energy efficiency terms. Utility Room
The utility room is acting as a buffer between the
kitchen and garage, although the doors are not air tight. It is
difficult to see where the services are running, as many were boxed in
when the extension was built. It appears that the original exterior
wall has been dismantled and the stone re-used for the exterior of the
new extension. Garage
There are several issues to be addressed here. Firstly, the fire
regulations obligations have not been resolved regarding the ceiling
and the inner walls. The plasterboarding to the ceiling is only a
single layer with gaps, which cannot comply. A second layer needs to be
applied, with the joints staggered and then plastered. The same is true
of the two internal walls and attention should be given to making sure
that the exposed timbers of the staircase are properly enclosed in the
process. The internal door needs to be replaced with a fire door and
draught sealed. The gas meter has been boxed in, making access
difficult to the shut-off lever and the pressure test, and for inspection
of the security tags. Outside
There is a potential problem with bridging of the damp-proof course on
the more modern parts of the building, where block paving has been
brought up very nearly to the same level as the damp-proof course. Next
From the point of view of making the most of your property, in the short term, your priorities should be as follows:
Simon Lewis
Proposal
A development proposal is under construction, Hansford Square - home page
|